.
Feedback

Officials Detail Likely Cause of Airplane Crash That Killed Four

Authorities: 2011 plane crash on Westchester-Greenwich border linked to mechanical problems

 

A single-engine airplane crash on the Greenwich-Westchester border that in June of 2011 was likely caused by the pilot's decision to fly after learning of suspected mechanical problems, transportation officials announced this week.

The news comes on the heels of a study carried out by the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB). The board released a detailed report of the accident that includes weather information and comments from the coroner.

All aboard the aircraft—three passengers and one pilot—were killed on impact.

Officials spotlight a damaged cylinder piston in their findings, and state that witnesses saw "[the plane's] engine initially idle rough" upon starting up.

"The probable causes of this accident [are] the pilot's decision to depart on the flight with a suspected mechanical deficiency and his subsequent decision to fly the final approach at a reduced power setting," the report reads. "Contributing to the accident was the improper timing of the magneto(s) that resulted in a severe detonation event."

The aircraft slammed into trees when it was approximately 50 feet above the ground, and caught fire after impact. The blaze then consumed the fuselage and cockpit before being extinguished by fire authorities.

The victims were Keith Weiner, 63, Lisa Weiner, 51, Isabel Weiner 14, and Lucy Walsh, 14; all from Manhattan.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Westport Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Thomas Paine June 18, 2013 at 01:48 pm
Why is it the panel for this event does not include a single advocate for gun-owners' rights? WithRead More all due respect to Chief McNamara, why does the panel no include a person who can speak to gun safety from a gun-owning civilian's perspective? ML, you claim that the assembled folks "do not offer judgements about gun ownership" but they are not including a single voice that can offer perspective on gun ownership. I have been to "education" sessions sponsored by Meg's March for Change and they are one-sided indoctrinations into gun control advocacy. >>>> I was in Hartford for the public hearings in January when both Meg and March co-founder Nancy gave their personal testimonies and they all but threatened the legislators on the panel with election day retribution for all those who did not tow the gun-control line of thinking (i.e. March and CAGV). To suggest that Meg "does not offer judgements" is fallacious and disingenuous.
Nutrition therapist, Meredith Mulhearn, launched her Ridgefield-based practice, Cucumber & Chamomile, and welcomes children and adults seeking healthier diets and optimal wellness.
M L Keim June 18, 2013 at 07:53 am
Please post on the appropriate business board. This is for non-commercial community announcements.
FHA Exposed June 17, 2013 at 11:47 am
http://m.youtube.com/index?&desktop_uri=%2F#/watch?v=Jcf0_3SA8xE